Ceramic Vs Live Rock

Bio balls and ceramic rings vs live rock in the sump.

Ceramic vs live rock. In addition to launching their live rock replacement vida rock cerameco has also develoepd techniques for producing large handmade ceramic reefscapes and backgrounds. Some manufacturers moved from the lava grate system because the lava rock would crumble and leave a mess in the grill. Other manufacturers found that to get the same vaporizing flavors from the lava they. Ceramic rings can hold a second beneficial bacteria.

Ceramic briquettes vs lava rock. Tumbling media has four functions. These bacteria eat nitrates and will only survive where there is no oxygen present. The ceramic briquette was introduced to replace the lava rock as a cleaner more heat retentive alternative.

3 it is used to improve the tumbling action in the tumbler barrel. Since the withdrawal of reef ceramics from the american aquarium market there has been a void of ceramic reef structures available to reef aquarists but these new pieces from cerameco are not only more interesting but. This can be prevented to some extent by sealing the floor with a quality chemical ceramic tile sealer. 2 it is used to cushion fragile rock materials during the tumbling process.

You won t find this bacteria in plastic or foam filter media. Ceramic is made from clay and sediments which are baked hard in a kiln. Ok everybody condemn bio balls and ceramic rings as detritus catchments tools and creating a nitrate factory. 1 it delivers grit to hard to reach rock surfaces.

Yes i do agree that they do catch a lot of junk because stirring or moving them stir up a lot of green water. Denitrifying bacteria live deep inside rock ceramic and other porous materials where oxygen cannot reach them.